In this case you must take care about the list and make sure to select the right disk. It means that the secure boot solution doesn't work with your machine, so you need to turn off the option, and disable secure boot in the BIOS. But unless it exploits a Secure Boot vulnerability or limitation (or you get cozy with the folks controlling shim keys), that bootloader should require to be enrolled to pass Secure Boot validation, in the same manner as Ventoy does it. espero les sirva, pueden usar rufus, ventoy, easy to boot, etc. Follow the guide below to quickly find a solution. I made a larger MEMZ.img and that runs on Easy2Boot and grubfm in VBOX but it goes wrong booting via Ventoy for some reason. This means current is 32bit UEFI mode. Currently there is only a Secure boot support option for check. It says that no bootfile found for uefi. I have installed Ventoy on my USB and I have added ISO file: "Win10SupperLite_TeamOS_Edition.iso" Sign in Although a .efi file with valid signature is not equivalent to a trusted system. Select the images files you want to back up on the USB drive and copy them. (I updated to the latest version of Ventoy). This same image I boot regularly on VMware UEFI. Guiding you with how-to advice, news and tips to upgrade your tech life. only ventoy give error "No bootfile found for UEFI! If you did the above as described, exactly, then you now have a good Ventoy install of latest version, but /dev/sdX1 will be type exFAT and we want to change that to ext4, so start gparted, find that partition (make sure it is unmounted via right click in gparted), format it to ext4 and make sure to . Copyright Windows Report 2023. No, you don't need to implement anything new in Ventoy. Hello , Thank you very very much for your testings and reports. Secure Boot was supported from Ventoy 1.0.07, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. When it asks Delete the key (s), select Yes. However what currently happens is that people who do have Secure Boot enabled will currently not be alerted to these at all. I'm hoping other people can test and report because it will most likely be a few weeks before this can make it to the top of my priority list @ventoy, are you interested in a proper implementation of Secure Boot support? Open Rufus and select the USB flash drive under "Device" and select Extended Windows 11 Installation under Image option. That is to say, a WinPE.iso or ubuntu.iso file can be booted fine with secure boot enabled(even no need for the user to whitelist them) but it may contain a malicious application in it. try 1.0.09 beta1? GRUB2, from my experiences does this automatically. @adrian15, could you tell us your progress on this? So as @pbatard said, the secure boot solution is a stopgap and that's why Ventoy is still at 1.0.XX. But of course, it's your choice to pick what you think is best for your users and the above is just one opinion on the matter. i was test in VMWare 16 for rufus, winsetupusb, yumiits okay, https://drive.google.com/file/d/1_mYChRFanLEdyttDvT-cn6zH0o6KX7Th/view?usp=sharing. , Laptop based platform: Personally, I don't have much of an issue with Ventoy using the current approach as a stopgap solution, as long as it is agreed that this is only a stopgap, since it comes with a huge drawback, and that a better solution (validation of that the UEFI bootloaders chain loaded from GRUB pass Secure Boot validation when Secure Boot has been enabled by the user) needs to be implemented in the long run. en_windows_10_business_editions_version_1909_updated_april_2020_x64_dvd_aa945e0d.iso | 5 GB, en_windows_10_business_editions_version_2004_x64_dvd_d06ef8c5.iso | 5 GB If the ISO is on the tested list, then clearly it is a problem with your particular equipment, so you need to give the details. 1.- comprobar que la imagen que tienes sea de 64 bits Error : @FadeMind Thank you very much for adding new ISOs and features. You can install Ventoy to USB drive, Removable HD, SD Card, SATA HDD, SSD, NVMe . Edit: Disabling Secure Boot didn't help. @pbatard and reboot.pro.. and to tinybit specially :) Thnx again. The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: Please test this ISO file with VirtualMachine(e.g. Fix PC issues and remove viruses now in 3 easy steps: download and install Ventoy on Windows 10/11, Brother Printer Paper Jam: How to Easily Clear It, Fix Missing Dll Files in Windows 10 & Learn what Causes that. Ventoy is a free and open-source tool used to create bootable USB disks. @pbatard Correct me if I'm wrong, but even with physical access, the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? I would assert that, when Secure Boot is enabled, every single time an unsigned bootloader is loaded, a warning message should be displayed. FreeNAS-11.3-U2.1.iso (FreeBSD based) tested using ventoy-1.0.08 hung during boot in both bios and uefi at the following error; da1: Attempt to query device size failed: NOT READY, Medium not present The latest version of Ventoy, an open source program for Windows and Linux to create bootable media using image file formats such as ISO or WMI, introduces experimental support for the IMG file format.. Ventoy distinguishes itself from other programs of its kind, e.g. Rufus or WoeUSB, in several meaningful ways.The program does not extract ISO images or other image formats to the USB drive but . With this option, in theory, Ventoy can boot fine no matter whether the secure boot in the BIOS is enabled or disabled. This option is enabled by default since 1.0.76. Any ideas? @ValdikSS Thanks, I will test it as soon as possible. Menu. # Archlinux minimal Install with btrfs ## Introduction If you don't know about Arch Linux, and willing to learn, then check this post, - [Arch Linux](https://wiki . And it's possible that the UEFI specs went as far as specifying that specific aspects of the platform security, such as disk encryption through TPM, should only be available if Secure Boot is enabled. Paragon ExtFS for Windows Even though I copied the Windows 10 ISO to flash drive, which presumably has a UEFI boot image on it, neither of my Vostros would recognize it. puedes poner cualquier imagen en 32 o 64 bits To create a USB stick that is compatible with USB 3.0 using the native boot experience of the Windows 10 Technical Preview media (or Windows 8/Windows 8.1), use DiskPart to format the USB stick and set the partition to active, then copy all of the files from inside the ISO . error was now displayed in 1080p. Still having issues? Is there any progress about secure boot support? Option 2: Only boot .efi file with valid signature. arnaud. and leave it up to the user. Open net installer iso using archive manager in Debian (pre-existing system). Ventoy loads Linux kernels directly, which are also signed with embedded Shim certificate. Well, that's pretty much exactly what I suggested in points 1-4 from the original post, with point 4 altered from "an error should be returned to the user and bootx64.efi should not be launched" to "an error should be returned to the user who can then decide if they still want to launch bootx64.efi". They do not provide a legacy boot option if there is a fat partition with an /EFI folder on it. So from ventoy 1.0.09, an option for secure boot is added in Ventoy2Disk.exe/Ventoy2Disk.sh and default is disabled. Open File Explorer and head to the directory where you keep your boot images. edited edited edited edited Sign up for free . The MISO_EFI partition contains only 1 folder called "efi" and another folder in it called "boot" which contains a single file called "bootx64.efi.". may tanong po ulit ako yung pc ko po " no bootfile found for uefi image does not support x64 uefi" i am using ventoy galing po sa linux ko, gusto ko po isang laptop ko gawin naman windows, ganyan po lagi naka ilang ulit na po ako, laptop ko po kasi ayaw na bumalik sa windows mula nung ginawa ko syang linux, nagtampo siguro kaya gusto ko na po ibalik sa windows salamat po sa makakasagot at sa . ISO: GeckoLinux_STATIC_Plasma.x86_64-152.200719..iso (size: 1,316MB) . They can't eliminate them totally, but they can provide an additional level of protection. Interestingly enough, the ISO does contain the efi files as I made sure to convert the whole IMG, which on the other hand is the basis for the creation of a memtest flash drive. I have absolutely no problem with letting the user choose if they want to run a bootloader that failed Secure Boot validation, and I think this might be the better way to do it indeed. openSUSE-Tumbleweed-KDE-Live-x86_64-Snapshot20200326-Media.iso - 952MB Ventoy does support Windows 10 and 11 and users can bypass the Windows 11 hardware check when installing. @BxOxSxS Please test these ISO files in Virtual Machine (e.g. So it is impossible to get these ISOs to work with ventoy without enabling legacy support in the bios settings? How did you get it to be listed by Ventoy? If the ISO file name is too long to displayed completely. I remember that @adrian15 tried to create a sets of fully trusted chainload chains I'm not talking about CSM. The idea that Ventoy users "should know what they are getting into" or that "it's pointless to check UEFI bootloaders for Secure Boot" once Ventoy has been enrolled is disingenuous at best. Sorry, I meant to upgrade from the older version of Windows 11 to 22H2. debes desactivar secure boot en el bios-uefi For example, GRUB 2 is licensed under GPLv3 and will not be signed. However, some ISO files dont support UEFI mode so booting those files in UEFI will not work. @steve6375 *far hugh* -> Covid-19 *bg*. , ctrl+alt+del . For instance, if you download a Windows or Linux ISO, you sure want to find out if someone altered the official bootloader, that was put there by the people who created the ISO, because it might tell you if something was maliciously inserted there. @pbatard No bootfile found for UEFI with Ventoy, But OK witth rufus. The USB partition shows very slow after install Ventoy. Fix them with this tool: If the advices above haven't solved your issue, your PC may experience deeper Windows problems. 1. 1.0.80 actually prompts you every time, so that's how I found it. I can confirm it was the reason for some ISOs to not boot (ChimeraOS, Manjaro Gnome). Ventoy does not always work under VBox with some payloads. Just like what is the case with Ventoy, I don't have much of an issue with having some leeway, on account that implementing proper signature validation requires some effort, during which unsigned bootloaders may be accepted, so as not inconvenience users too much. If so, please include aflag to stop this check from happening! No bootfile found for UEFI! Tested Distros (Updating) I don't have a IA32 hardware device, so I normally test it in VMware. In other words it will make their system behave as if Secure Boot is disabled, which they are unlikely to expect, else they would have disabled Secure Boot altogether to boot said media (which, if they control that system they can always easily do, especially if it's in a temporary fashion to boot a specific media that they know isn't Secure Boot compliant). Hope it would helps, @ventoy I still have this error on z580 with ventoy 1.0.16. @ventoy I can confirm this, using the exact same iso. Thus, being able to check that an installer or boot loader wasn't tampered with is not a "nice bonus" but is something that must be enforced always in a Secure Boot enabled environment, regardless of the type of media you are booting from, because Secure Boot is very much designed to help users ensure that, when they install an OS, and provided that OS has a chain of trust that extends all the way, any alteration of any of the binary code that the OS executes, be it as part of the installation or when the OS is running, will be detected and reported to the user and prevent the altered binary code to run. About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE, Ventoy2Disk.exe can't enumerate my USB device. Extracting the very same efi file and running that in Ventoy did work! Won't it be annoying? If anyone has Secure Boot enabled, there should be no scenario where an unsigned bootloader gets executed without at least a big red warning, even if the user indicated that they were okay with that. The live folder is similar to Debian live. Perform a scan to check if there are any existing errors on the USB. I have the same error, I can boot from the same usb, the same iso file and the same Ventoy on asus vivobook but not on asus ROG. MD5: f424a52153e6e5ed4c0d44235cf545d5 @MFlisar Hiren's Boot CD was down with UEFI (legacy still has some problem), manjaro-kde-20.0-rc3-200422-linux56.iso BOOT Does it work on these machines (real or emulated) by booting it from a CDR / .iso image? Many thanks! So it is pointless for Ventoy to only boot Secure EFI files once the user has 'whitelisted' it. But MediCat USB is already open-source, built upon the open-source Ventoy project. slitaz-next-180716.iso, Symantec.Ghost.Boot.CD.12.0.0.10658.x64.iso, regular-xfce-latest-x86_64.iso - 1.22 GB This iso seems to have some problem with UEFI. When the user is away again, remove your TPM-exfiltration CPU and place the old one back. . but CorePure64-13.1.iso does not as it does not contain any EFI boot files. You literally move files around and use a text editor to edit theme.text, ventoy.json, and so on. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. git clone git clone If you get some error screen instead of the above blue screen (for example, Linpus lite xxxx). This means current is Legacy BIOS mode. Changed the extension from ".bin" to ".img" according to here & it didn't work. Probably you didn't delete the file completely but to the recycle bin. plist file using ProperTree. I would also like to point out that I reported the issue as a general remark to help with Ventoy development, after looking at the manner in which Ventoy was addressing the Secure Boot problem (and finding an issue there), rather than as an actual Ventoy user. This ISO file doesn't change the secure boot policy. In a fit of desperation, I tried another USB drive - this one 64GB instead of 8GB. https://download.freebsd.org/releases/arm64/aarch64/ISO-IMAGES/13.1/FreeBSD-13.1-RELEASE-arm64-aarch64-disc1.iso. You don't need anything special to create a UEFI bootable Arch USB. Getting the same error as @rderooy. Ventoy is open-source software that allows users to create ISO, WIM, IMG, VHS(x), and EFI files onto a bootable USB drive. Can you add the exactly iso file size and test environment information? You can repair the drive or replace it. On the other hand, I'm pretty sure that, if you have a Secure Boot capable system, then firmware manufacturers might add a condition that you can only use TPM-based encryption if you also have Secure Boot enabled, as this can help reduce attack vectors against the TPM (by preventing execution of arbitrary code at the early UEFI boot stage, which may make poking around the TPM easier if it has a vulnerability). Users can update Ventoy by installing the latest version or using VentoyU, a Ventoy updater utility. Any way to disable UEFI booting capability from Ventoy and only leave legacy? The main point of Secure Boot is to prevent (or at least warn about) the execution of bootloaders that have not been vetted by Microsoft or one of the third parties that Microsoft signed a shim for (such as Red Hat). preloader-for-ventoy-prerelease-1.0.40.zip, https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/grub2/+bug/1401532, [issue]: Instead of dm-patch, consider a more secure and upstreamable solution that does not do kernel taint. Already on GitHub? An encoding issue, perhaps (for the text)? the main point of Secure Boot is to allow TPM to validate the running system before releasing stored keys, isn't it? If you pull the USB drive out immediately after finish copy a big ISO file, most probably the file in the USB will be corrupted. @DocAciD I don't have a Lenovo, ThinkPad or a ThinkCentre, Getting the same on TinyCoreLiInux (CorePlus), URL; http://tinycorelinux.net/downloads.html, The ISO must be UEFI-bootable and have a UEFI64 boot file \EFI\BOOT\BOOTX64.EFI if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. Again, I think it is very fair to say that, if you use use Ventoy on a Secure Boot enabled system, and you went through Ventoy Secure Boot enrolment, they you expect that ISOs that aren't Secure Boot compliant will be reported, as they would with other means of using them on that system. Maybe the image does not suport IA32 UEFI! I still don't know why it shouldn't work even if it's complex. Do I need a custom shim protocol? So even when someone physically unplugs my SSD and installs a malicious bootloader/OS to it, it won't be able to decrypt the main OS partition. The main issue is that users should at least get some warning that a bootloader failed SB validation when SB is enabled, instead of just letting everything go through. Please refer: About Fuzzy Screen When Booting Window/WinPE. plzz help. I tested Manjaro ISO KDE X64. Ventoy also supports BIOS Legacy. Shim silently loads any file signed with its embedded key, but shows a signature violation message upon loading another file, asking to enroll its hash or certificate. 2. bionicpup64-8.0-uefi.iso Legacy+UEFI tested with VM, ZeroShell-3.9.3-X86.iso Legacy tested with VM, slax-64bit-9.11.0.iso Legacy tested with VM. There are many kinds of WinPE. Best Regards. what is the working solution? https://github.com/ventoy/Ventoy/releases/tag/v1.0.33, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F5NFuDCZQ00, http://tinycorelinux.net/13.x/x86_64/release/. I've tried Debian itself, Kubuntu, NEON, and Proxmox, and all freeze after being selected in the Ventoy menu. Windows 10 32bit Ventoy About File Checksum 1. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" hello everyone Using ventoy, if I try to install the ISO. Another issue about Porteus and Aporteus : if we copy ISO via dd or other tools or copy ISO contents to EFI partition of USB work perfectly in UEFI. This means current is ARM64 UEFI mode. Is there any solution for this? Menu Option-->Secure Boot Support for Ventoy2Disk.exe and -s option for Ventoy2Disk.sh The file formats that Ventoy supports include ISO, WIM, IMG, VHD(x), EFI files. That would be my preference, because someone who wants to bypass Secure Boot indiscriminately, without disabling Secure Boot altogether, should have a clue what they are doing, and the problem with presenting options as a dialog is that you end up with tutorials that advise users to pick the less secure option, because whoever wrote happened to find the other choices inconvenient without giving much thought about the end result. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI" @steve6375 I've mounted that partition and deleted EFI folder but it's still recognized as EFI, both in Windows Disk Management and the BIOS, just doesn't boot anymore. For the two bugs. https://forum.porteus.org/viewtopic.php?t=4997. On my other Laptop from other Manufacturer is booting without error. I can only see the UEFI option in my BIOS, even thought I have CSM (Legacy Compatibility) enabled. So I don't really see how that could be used to solve the specific problem we are being faced with here, because, however you plan to use UEFI:NTFS when Secure Boot is enabled, your target (be it Ventoy or something else) must be Secure Boot signed. This disk, after being installed on a USB flash drive and booted from, effectively disables Secure Boot protection features and temporary allows to perform almost all actions with the PC as if Secure Boot is disabled. ISO file name (full exact name) I'm afraid I'm very busy with other projects, so I haven't had a chance. It's what Secure Boot is designed to do on account of being a trust chain mechanism that, when enabled, MUST alert if trust is broken. if this issue was addressed), it could probably be Secure Boot signed, in the same manner as UEFI:NTFS was itself Secure Boot signed. . 1.0.84 MIPS www.ventoy.net ===> Please test and tell your opinion. Vmware) with UEFI mode and to confirm that the ISO file does support UEFI mode. Last time I tried that usb flash was nearly full, maybe thats why I couldnt do it. I cannot boot into Ventoy with Secure Boot enabled on my machine though, it only boots when I disable Secure Boot in BIOS. 3. So all Ventoy's behavior doesn't change the secure boot policy. The same applies to OS/2, eComStation etc. Format UDF in Windows: format x: /fs:udf /q 2. . orel-2.12.22-26.12.2019_13.14.livecd.iso - 1.1 GB Already have an account? Tested on 1.0.57 and 1.0.79. @ventoy if you want can you test this too :) Then the process of reading your "TPM-secured" disk becomes as easy as: User awareness that their encrypted data was read: Nil. The MX21_February_x64.iso seems OK in VirtualBox for me. - . Legacy\UEFI32\UEFI64 boot? If a user is booting a lot of unsigned bootloaders with Secure Boot enabled, they clearly should disable Secure Boot in their settings, because, for what they are doing, it is pretty much pointless. Yes, I already understood my mistake. Most of modern computers come with Secure Boot enabled by default, which is a requirement for Windows 10 certification process. 6. So I apologise for that. ElementaryOS boots just fine. Keeping Ventoy and ISO files updated can help avoid any future booting issues with Ventoy. Secure Boot is supported since Ventoy-1.0.07, please use the latest version and see the Notes. Maybe the image does not support X64 UEFI! 1: The Windows 7 USB/DVD Download Tool is not compatible with USB 3.0. The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result, It also happens when running Ventoy in QEMU, The MEMZ virus nyan cat as an image file produces a very weird result Maybe because of partition type Sign in VentoyU allows users to update and install ISO files on the USB drive. Although it could be disabled on all typical motherboards in UEFI setup menu, sometimes it's not easily possible e.g. No! And, unless you're going to stand behind every single Ventoy user to explain why you think it shouldn't matter that Ventoy will let any unsigned bootloader through, that's just not going to fly. The boot.wim mode appears to be over 500MB. *lil' bow* Ubuntu has shim which load only Ubuntu, etc. My guesd is it does not. ventoy_x64.efi/ventoy_util_x64.efi ) , they do need digital signatures. In Linux, you need to specify the device to install Ventoy which can be a USB drive or local disk. Ctrl+i to change boot mode of some ISOs to be more compatible Ctrl+w to use wimboot to boot Windows and WinPE ISOs (e.g. Minor one: when you try to start unsigned .efi executable, error message is shown for a very brief time and quickly disappears. I didn't try install using it though. By default, secure boot is enabled since version 1.0.76. Getting the same error with Arch Linux. But, whereas this is good security practice, that is not a requirement. I should also note that the key used in Ventoy is the same used in Super UEFIinSecureBoot Disk, my key. using the direct ISO download method on MS website. Parrot-security-4.9.1_x64.iso - 3.8 GB, eos-eos3.7-amd64-amd64.200310-013107.base.iso - 2.83 GB, minimal_linux_live_15-Dec-2019_64-bit_mixed.iso - 18.9 MB, OracleLinux-R7-U3-Server-x86_64-dvd.iso - 4.64 GB, backbox-6-desktop-amd64.iso - 2.51 GB Then Ventoy will load without issue if the secure boot is enabled in the BIOS. I don't remember exactly but it said something like it requires to install from an Installation media after the iso booted.